Thursday, November 23, 2006

We Wiilly, Wiilly Wanna Wii

I've been aware for over a year of the planned release of Wii. Last year, when the first videos started appearing around the 'net, I thought that controller looked really awesome. When Xbox 360 came out I thought we HAD to be soon to follow but then I heard it was still going to be another 6 months. Then another report in the summer said it would be released before the holiday season. I thought, wow, they must have had problems getting it to work for it to take so long. Maybe it's not all that great?

Well, I have seen all the videos and heard the hype... and because we don't have much money, I just was not sure that I would go out and trade in my modded Gamecube for a Wii which wasn't going to be that different or may not be able to deliver what it promises.

Our local library closes quite early except on one night of the week - Tuesday, it is open until 8pm. We don't often get to go there because of the short hours, but Tuesday my daughter had a Sparks meeting held there so we decided to hang around the library while she attended her thing in the "kid's room". The library also has what they call a "Teen Room", where they have video games like an Xbox and PCs for use by teens.

And on Tuesday, one of the kids in the teen room brought in his Wii.

The videos don't even touch on the story. Watching kids play Tennis, Golf and Boxing on the Wii was just amazing. It was fantastic seeing it work, and the realistic movements they used to control their in-game players. There didn't seem to be any radical glitches or problems, it was just smooth and it was delivering on gaming that was an order of magnitude over and above what M$'s Xbox and Sony's Play Stations deliver. The kids were playing like they were IN the game. They were moving around and instead of mashing buttons were swinging virtual rackets and clubs in the form of the Wiimote control.

Nintendo has really come through. Sure, the console does not have the uber-powered graphics that the others offer but let's thing for a minute - what has been more popular, the straightforward Gameboy systems with basic graphics or the hugely overpriced PSP? It is the game play that counts and that is where Nintendo has delivered and taken the lead - again. Adding to that that you can plug in Gamecube and old Nintendo controllers and download all the "retro" Nintendo games to your console, and that you can still play every one of your Gamecube games because it is completely backwards compatible, and the Wii may be the best gaming machine in the history of gaming machines.

Unfortunately, even though it is the least expensive of any of the new consoles, we can't afford one and I don't know when we will be able to.

Having so little money sucks. Anyone want to give a Wii to a low-income family for a holiday gift? I promise, we'll be sure to give it a good home.

Friday, November 10, 2006

The Camera Giveth - and the Camera Taketh Away!

An interesting story at the CBC about some new digital cameras equipped with a "slimming" feature. If you read it, you get down to the end of the story where some Sociology Prof nitwit starts expressing all these "concerns" about the cameras.

Apparently the woman has never heard of Photoshop - I guess that's understandable, after all she is a Professor at the University of Winnipeg, not exactly what you would call a technological capital in Canada. Basically all the cameras do internally is change the aspect ratio of the photo slightly - which also leads to the enhancement (and I use THAT term very loosely) being called the "pointy-head" feature. Anyone can make a picture look thinner, there are lots of freeware solutions out there to let you edit pictures and most cameras have at least one piece of image-manipulation software bundled with them. If someone has issues with their body and wants to make themselves look different, that have been able to do it since digital photography began. Heck, they could have done it in a dark room back when people had to have film processed and developed, it doesn't take much manipulation using your enlarger to adjust a photo's aspect ratio either. Perhaps her concern is that now it is "easier"? Maybe I'm too conceited for my own good, but as a photographer myself I have never considered taking a good-quality picture "easy", and having such a feature on cameras might (although I doubt it) reduce some of the downright AWFUL pictures some people take. If someone has body image issues then the least of the concerns about them should be whether or not they can take a picture of themselves looking thinner. Maybe she'd like to ban funhouse mirrors, as well?

If you aren't even sure that the old chestnut about the camera adding 10 lbs is accurate, well, it is. It is simply a question of how an image is interpretted - where your eyes see in 3 dimensions and you can discern that a person is not flat, the camera cannot. Without taking the time to do a lot of lighting work to enhance and show shadows and depth, a photo more or less simply interprets all the points of you the same - and making you look much wider and therefore heavier. It explains why some people are notoriously unphotogenic too - they have features that just don't interpret when placed on a single plane. Often portrait photographers take shots of you sitting around a 45 degree angle to the camera to help reduce this effect. The foreshortening effect on an angle helps demonstrate the real distance across your body, rather than forcing your eye to (poorly) interpolate how close or far the center of your thorax is from the point of the hip or shoulder as happens in a straight-on shot.

Confused? So am I. Just understand that a camera is taking something 3D and making it 2D and without a skilled photographer, you're going to look heavier. Try taking a picture of a car straight from the front, and compare it to what you can see actually looking at the car - sometimes they don't even look like the same vehicle. The camera adds 2 tonnes, man! It turned my Cavalier into a Hummer!

Thursday, November 09, 2006

Belinda's Boner

I hope by now you have all heard about the Ralph Klein comments at a celebrity roast (see video below).

Sad thing is that it is true. Stronach - bitch that she is - doesn't give a rats ass about what party she is involved in, she has some delusional idea that she should be the Prime Minister of Canada. I am sure she would soon jump to the Green Party if she thought they were going to win the next election and had an upcoming possible leadership change.

Stronach is a power-hungry freak show. My opinion was that she was involved with Peter MacKay hoping that if she could not be in power, she could be close to power... then crossed to the Liberals hoping that when Mr. Dithers inevitibly stepped down she'd be able to try out for that spot. Then when she realised she didn't have a shot at it, instead of admitting that she was just outclassed, she said she wasn't running because she doesn't like the way the party chooses a leader.

Maybe I'm naive, but I always thought that at least PART of the idea of seeking public office was that you wanted to serve the people. Not so with Stronach; to her it's like some kind of fashion show-beauty contest. I don't know if anyone has told her that she would not, in fact, be Canada's first female Prime Minister because I don't think she realises that either. She's a spoiled-brat, multi-millionaire heiress seeking attention and acclaim without any actual experience to warrant holding an important position.

Belinda Stronach - Canada's very own Paris Hilton.

Thursday, October 05, 2006

How Original!

Last year there were several new programs that came to CBS et al, and many of them did not survive. What I find really sad, though, is what kind of programs DID survive.

After seeing the commercials that made it seem like it may have been getting more interesting, I decided to find torrents for the last few episodes of "Touched By The Sixth Sense Of A Dead Ghost Whisperer Like Me". You can call it "Ghost Whisperer" for short like CBS does, but... meh. Is there ANYTHING original in this show?

It is strange that a show as innovative and compelling as "Threshold" was cancelled before finding its legs, but something as stupid as "Touched By The Sixth Sense Of A Dead Ghost Whisperer Like Me" carries on. Sure, Threshold had a few body-snatcherish elements but each week they had a weird new way to tell the story. TBTSSOADGWLM just keeps doing almost the same thing over and over and over again (hey, lets make it a KID ghost this week, what an idea), but covers no ground that has not been done far better by other shows and movies. And what is up with that Aisha Tyler chick - does she refuse to sign any more than a one year contract or something? Maybe she is trying for a record for short repeat character stints in television series by an African American or something... I'm sure there is some kind of award for it someplace.

If shows like Cheers had been cancelled just based on ratings, they'd have never become classics. There seems to be absolutely no desire any more in TV to do something innovative, or when they do something they THINK is innovative it is something lame like dividing people by race in Survivor. It's like the USA, the biggest influence over most of our TV programming, doesn't like anything different or smart. It's too confusing for them.

With the current state of network programming, I am sure that soon there will be an appearance by Lucille Ball or some other dead TV star on TBTSSOADGWLM, in CGI form. That or an appearance by Lee Harvey Oswald protesting his innocence. Please - just PLEASE - not Della Reese, ok CBS?

I've been getting into a few network shows that are new or newish. Bones is great. Studio 60 so far is hilarious and well done. Heroes seems compelling. Most of them don't hold a candle to shows like Battlestar Galactica which are produced outside the realm of the most idiotic TV execs... but sadly that means that at least one of them is going to end up cancelled this year.

Tuesday, October 03, 2006

Sleazeball

Charles Carl Roberts.

Hardly a name that should inspire fear, is it?

I don't believe in Heaven and Hell and all that stuff, but today I am having a difficult time believing in forgiveness or compassion.

I don't give a rats ass what happened when you were 12, Chuck. I don't give a fuck that you lost an infant daughter. I don't care if you were mentally ill, because your actions demonstrate that no matter how out of it you were you knew right from wrong.

You chose to attack people who abhor violence, one of the few cultures in the world who truly live what they believe about peace and non-violence. And you knew it... you lived right there, and you knew it.

Today, I am weeping for the families and community... I weep for mankind, and this awful capacity we have inside.

I don't believe in prayer or a single supreme being... but today, I am praying for the victims and families.

Today, we are all Amish.

Monday, October 02, 2006

Oh STOP It

Geez... now we have a school shooting in an Amish school. (And this guy, he was a real gutsy one - he walked in and sent out all the males, and a pregnant woman, and then started shooting girls. I mean, come on, shooting AMISH GIRLS? This is an asshole who thinks shooting fish in a barrel is not only cool, but an honourable pastime. Of course, the fucknut sent out the pregnant woman so he could show what a decent guy he was before killing children. I am sure he will find lots of good karma in that while he is repeatedly reincarnated as a late-term-aborted fetus.)

I am sure all the news outlets will now be decrying this horrible "epidemic".

Amazing how it appears that Kimveer Gill managed to inspire these psychotic morons to start shooting up schools.

The sad thing about this is that nothing could be done about these psychos except to keep them off the god damn news. As long as these suicidal attention whores think they are going to get their name on the news while committing "suicide by police", these sorts of things will just keep on happening.

It's the same phenonmenon as buying Celine Dion albums - if you keep buying them, she's going to keep making them. As long as the Queen of the Media Whores gets attention she's going to keep holding news conferences to claim she doesn't want it.

Once again - if a psycho wants you dead, you're dead. It's just too bad that the new cool-chic for the unstable is to shoot kids in schools.

STOP PUTTING THEM ON TV!

P.S. Saddest part is that some kid somewhere is going to get suspended from school for bringing a butter knife to put jam on his bread under some "Zero Tolerance" bullshit that would in no way have prevented ANY of these things from happening. Ironically one of the shootings happened when they tried to take a gun away from a student in a school with just such a rule, and he killed his principal. Nice policy.

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

Migratory Bears

Since we now have our own web space and domain, I am about to begin migrating all of my blog entries from Blogger to our own space.

Once our new domain is confirmed I will post it here as a reference. Once it is done, I will be blogging there and not here any more.

Thanks for your patience.

UPDATE: the blog homepage is now http://www.holyjumbo.ca/figjam... not that it is a lot of help since you would have had to have found it to see this post.

Friday, September 22, 2006

GM Campaign

I don't know if they are doing it in the states as well, but in Canada GM has had an ad campaign going on about "Johnny" in support of their small car line - mainly the ugly Aveo (No, I don't care what you say, the damn thing is ugly).

I think I get the intent of the ads - sort of an after school special parody sort of thing - but I find them just stupid. Younger kids would not get the "Past School Special/ABC After School Special" aspect of it but it MUST be the audience they are aiming at, right? Certainly it could not be my generation, because I don't think I am alone in thinking I would not buy one of those cars if only just to protest the lameness of the ads.

But lets examine what "Johnny", the protagonist in the ads, has done so far:

  1. Been terribly uptight about someone eating in his car like a total clean freak.
  2. Refused to drive his friend and 4 girls in his car, leaving his friend behind, unwilling to be possibly squeezed up against a girl.
  3. Hated loud music (although no one cranked up any house or dance so it's not totally conclusive).
  4. Refused to make out with a hot red headed chick - giving the excuse of possibly getting a parking ticket - instead agreeing to go out to get food at a restaurant.
This leads me to arrive at an inevitable conclusion. GM is trying to cash in on the craze over shows like "Queer Eye"...

Johnny is totally gay.

Not that there is anything wrong with that.

Monday, September 18, 2006

Accident Prohan?

Lindsay Lohan has been hospitalized AGAIN.

Seems like the girl just can't keep it together. Friday, she fractured her wrist walking in flat shoes in an "outdoor area". Apparently, there is going to be an "investigation" to find out if Milk Studios "took adequate health and safety precautions with the ground". Yep, that's right - apparently now when you deal with Lindsay you are responsible for not only worshipping the ground the spoiled brat walks on, but for making it nice and squishy for her to fall down on too.

And if you need a recap - so far this year she has been hospitalized for a severe asthma attack in January, then a couple of weeks later needed stitches in her shin after an incident with a broken cup at Bryan Adams house, and in July was again in the care of doctors for exhaustion or dehydration (Hollywood code for: I did too much crystal meth last night).

Good thing she can afford to pay her medical bills.

UPDATE: She was back in the hospital for "Pain" 2 days after getting treatment for her wrist. I think they should just have an ambulance follow her around.

Thursday, September 14, 2006

If I Said It Once...

I have said it a hundred times. If a psycho wants you dead, you're dead. This is likely to get rambly, so hold on... Kimveer Gill obviously had some very serious issues with the world. He didn't want to be a part of society, didn't like the way the government was run, and didn't much trust most people in general. Hey - he's a lot like me. The difference is that I'm not about to and never will go and shoot up a school full of kids. At least I hope not . Anyway, he was a social misfit and an outcast, or at least that is what he portrayed himself to be online. Some part of him obviously felt that way... and the line between reality and fantasy became more and more blurred over time. This wasn't someone you would be able to reason with or reach out to. This wasn't something you could predict. Yet, as always, there are the usual chorus of idiots... the typical coalition of morons... who think that everything like this is preventable, or that someone needs to get sued, or that someone was not doing their job. Or that we should put metal detectors in schools and institute "Zero tolerance" polices. Sorry, morons - you know who you are - "Zero Tolerance" has absolutely NOTHING to do with what happened yesterday. Metal detectors would only have accomplished anything if they also had armed guards, and even then "Trench" the vampire freak would likely have just gunned them down before they could move. Saying it was preventable just isn't true. We live in a supposedly free society. That means that people are free to make their own decisions and suffer the consequences. Kimveer Gill suffered the consequences - he was shot dead by police. Had he lived he would have gone to jail or a psych ward. He CHOSE to break society's rules, whether his mental state dictated making that a rational choice or not. Criminals choose to break the rules on a regular basis. We can't police people's thoughts and live in a free society. All that can be done is what is done - make things like walking out and shooting people completely taboo, and hope that the stigma works to prevent it in most cases. I know how some people would answer this (they would be the other extreme of the borderline fringes) but - if you had a choice between taking the risk that 1 in 30 million people once every 10 years loses his mind and tries to shoot people or checking with a government official every time you wanted to wipe your ass or write in your blog, which would you rather? Oh, and Jack Layton, you are an ASSHOLE. In comments yesterday he asked "Was this an illegal gun?" WHAT THE FUCK difference does it make? Legal or illegal, he got his hands on a gun and killed people. Hell, even Stephen Harper didn't try to jump on politicizing the shootings so fast. Layton, who grew up in Montreal, was among the first national-level politicians interviewed and he could not resist trying to lay the groundwork for another of his borderline psychotic attacks on all government, any government, anywhere (ironic that he is a part of the government). So, if it was a legally registered weapon, it is the former Liberal government's fault for not implementing it right, and if it was an unregistered weapon in is the Conservative government's fault for trying to dismantle the gun registry... yeah, you know, that's pretty transparent, Jack. Off. Amazing to me is the fact that the incredibly heroic actions of a couple of mainline Montreal police officers are seemingly being downplayed. I don't know whether it is fear of negative publicity or not, but the Montreal Police Chief should have come out fully with what was written all over his face - his officers did a fantastic job, possibly preventing a lot more killing. They put themselves in harms way to save lives, and that's what police should be doing. We have a real hero on our hands and no one seems to even know who he (or she) was yet. I am not talking about United 93-type "heroism" - I am talking about risking your neck for others. It doesn't matter whether the guy ran out of ammo and they shot him or some other extenuating circumstances - this was a guy out to kill people and get himself shot by police and obliging him was the best thing to be done under the circumstances. Yeah, not exactly a huggy-bunny buddhist sounding philosophy, is it. Sorry. There are situations where you can negotiate and there are situations where you have to act. Maybe if someone had talked things over with Kimveer a couple of years back... maybe if his Mom had given him more hugs... maybe if his Dad had praised him when he built his first model M16, we wouldn't be here today. Realistically, though, nothing could have prevented this from the moment Gill decided he was going to take weapons and shoot people except if police had spotted him a few minutes sooner and shot him then. In our modern world, the law of the jungle is don't be in the wrong place at the wrong time. If you can figure out how to predict that, I will happily award you with the Johnny Smith Medal of Honour. UPDATE: Turns out Gill shot himself after being shot by the police. I reiterate - the police did a great job.

Thursday, September 07, 2006

We Miss Steve

We miss Steve Irwin. We decided to find something to wear, and black arm bands and stuff seemed so... old fashined? Lame? Meaningless? Someone I know decided on these. I think its cool and I will wear one. I guess he will live on forever on TV. I am not sure how the goodbye will be handled as his family has turned down a state funeral. And youtube has gone nutty. Don't type in Steve Irwin there.

Tuesday, September 05, 2006

Crikey!

Steve Irwin is dead. You know Steve Irwin - the Crocodile Hunter. I didn't hear about it until today, because the one page I went to this weekend has a news thing that is not updated on weekends. We were away at a wedding or working on our new business all weekend and I never watched any news or read anything on the web. Now, I didn't watch this guy faithfully on a daily basis or anything but I really admired his chutzpah not only in braving the creatures he did, but in fighting for conservation causes. He was one of the good guys. A bit crazy, maybe a little too interested in getting attention on television, but definitely one of the good guys. Apparently it was a wrong place-wrong time, freak accident where he was stung in the chest by a stingray. The sting hit him right in the heart - anyplace else would probably have not been fatal. This was sometime on Monday (the 4th), although some reports said Saturday. It saddens me to think that Bindi and Bob will now grow up without a father, and one who could have taught them so much. It pisses me off that there are now assholes crawling out of the woodwork saying, "Seem I told you so! TV makes people do crazy dangerous things! We must put an end to it!" All I can say to those people is, "Fuck you, assholes." Oh, and Germaine Greer, that goes double for you. Stephen Robert Irwin... February 22, 1962 - September 4, 2006 As an epitaph, I'll leave you with a comment he made a couple of years ago: "If something ever happens to me, people are gonna be like 'we knew a croc would get him!'"

Monday, September 04, 2006

Mac vs. PC

I am sure by now you have seen them on TV - those commercials for the Mac that portray Macs as "cool guy" while the PC is a geeky and confused chubby. PCs and Macs have, or used to have, different capabilities but the whole thing has always been an "elitist" thing. Its just the latest in a long line of Mac advertising schemes, trying to spin "unpopular and overpriced" into "elite and superior". Everyone on Earth who uses a PC looks at Macs and goes, no big deal... why pay so much for a computer? Why buy all different software? So they are more or less unpopular. But the Mac spin on that has always been that they are better quality and more expensive as a result, and that makes them elite and special and "better". So lets just make a comparison to a real-world situation - high school! You take two people in High School, a cheerleader who has 100 friends and a geeky, funny looking guy who has 2. The cheerleader is universally seen as popular and nice. The geek is seen as unpopular and weird. If you asked the cheerleader she might say he is a loser or she might say she doesn't know him, depending on her personality (is she Cordelia, Harmony, or Buffy?). If you asked the geek he would almost certainly call the cheerleader a bitch or a snob, while secretly wishing he could fuck her or be friends and hang out with her friends. If you asked them about themselves and their friends the cheerleader could give a range of answers from the "I'm the greatest" to "I'm just glad people like me", but the geek would almost universally say, "I'm just picky about who I am friends with" - as though he had a wide selection clamoring at his door. Fat chance. PCs are the "popular kids" - sometimes arrogant, sometimes swaggering, usually popular with lots of friends but also a few detractors. They are a part of the rumour mill, and sometimes victims of it. Like real people, a wide range of capabilities from the athletic (gaming) machine to the brainy (accounting) machine. Macs are the geeks - cut from roughly the same cloth, they can learn almost anything eventually and can do certain things well but often having difficulty with certain kinds of tasks. Most people avoid dealing with them because they seem disconnected, although those that get to know them well realise they are worthwhile after all - unfortunately they have such an inferiority complex that anything more popular must be bad. No one talks about them because no one thinks about them until they stand up naked on a cafeteria table and scream about being smarter than everyone. They're a bunch of Peter Parkers without any spider bites. So, there ya go. The Mac commercials have it backwards, the dorky unfit guy in glasses should be the Mac, not the PC.

Saturday, August 26, 2006

May Be Good

Lending more credibility and renown to the Green Party of Canada - Elizabeth May has been chosen as leader with over 60% of the vote on the final ballot. May was the founding Executive Director of the Sierra Club of Canada. She has written several books on environmental topics, and although sometimes I disagree on some hardline environmental issues she bites down on, this turns me even more to support the Green Party. I used to be a soft supporter largely thinking they were the best of a bad lot. Now, it may actually be a workable solution to some serious political bullshit in Canada. And maybe we'll get off the pot on some of the Kyoto issues which are being ignored. I met Elizabeth one time while trying to get involved in the Sydney Tar Ponds cleanup. We later moved away from the Sydney area and back to Ontario (like that's not changing one pollutant for another but that's another story) when it seemed that I was getting more ill and the cleanup was not progressing. This has to be one of the best things to have happened in Canadian Politics since the first time the Lie-berals got kicked out of power in the '80s. Well done, Elizabeth. Now sic 'em. Ottawa won't know what hit 'em. "Unlimited economic growth is the mentality of a cancer cell." - Elizabeth May, August 26, 2006

Thursday, August 24, 2006

My Very Educated Mother...

Just Sent Us Noodles? Oh yes, its true. That mnemonic they taught you as a kid, the one that got messed up between 1979 and 1999, is now out of date completely. Pluto has been kicked out of the planet club. Well, not COMPLETELY... they have removed it from the official list of planets in our solar system, which now has 8 planets, but it is still a "Dwarf Planet", a new designation that will be applied to many newly discovered Pluto-like objects in the outer reaches of our system. So now the kids have to learn a new... albeit shorter... mnemonic. And apparently, Disney will need to rename their dog. Or maybe, redraw him as a Yorkie...

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

Letter to Crabby Joe's/Obsidian Group Inc.

Re: Concerns In keeping with the spirit of Crabby Joe's, I'm going to describe and summarize our first experience with Crabby Joe's using language and descriptions compatible with your own marketing. You can do with this information internally what you choose, as at this point I am not certain that we will return to Crabby Joe's again.

We'll start with the once upon a time part of the story. And as long as this is, it is in fact summarized, it still won't take the hour and a half it took me to not get what I ordered to eat. But I digress...

Once upon a time, a family of 4 - Mom, Dad and 2 kids aged 1 and 5 went to Crabby Joe's to try it out. The family had decided that rather than using their iCoke points for getting the movie tickets they all loved, they would instead get a Crabby Joe's certificate and try out a new eating establishment. They don't reside in a town with a Crabby Joe's but there is one located about 40 km away in Belleville and it was decided that the next trip there they'd venture into this new eatery.

We wandered into Crabby Joe's about 7pm on Tuesday, August 22, 2006. We really didn't know anything about the place except for what we'd seen going by from the outside several times, but we realised that like many of the usual Bar & Grill type places there was a clear restaurant side and a bar side - the bar with the big screen TVs, high stools and tables and raised booths, and the restaurant with a few small TVs and normal-height seating at tables and booths. The bar side was quite full except for a few seats at the bar itself and a couple of high tables, while the restaurant side was only moderately populated with customers - many tables were empty but hadn't yet been cleared of the debris from former customers, but some were completely unoccupied. We also bemusedly noticed  that the wait staff wore T-shirts with phrases on the back saying things like "Don't give me attitude, I have enough of my own" and most notably, "Please speak slo'ly and clearly, I am not fluent in IDIOT."

Now, before I go any further I guess I should say something positive. I was always told over my years in restaurant management that I should try and start and finish all situations containing negativity and criticisms with something positive to keep from completely putting off the subject of the criticism. So, I have to praise Crabby Joe's for being so brave in hiring a bilingual person as translator for those who speak Idiot and Normal English. The hostess who greeted us was clearly a native Idiot speaker, although she was capable of passing a casual inspection as a speaker of Normal English. Perhaps she was born into a family of Idiot speakers and then went to English immersion school... I'm not sure, but there definitely seemed to be some kind of small communication barrier to begin with. Remember who it was who she had just greeted at the door - no, on second thought I'll just review in case your company has hired more like her to screen emails - a family of 4. 2 parents and 2 kids, the kids aged 1 and 5; Toddler and Kindergartner.

So the hostess, she looked us right in the eye and said "How many of you?" and we said "The 4 of us." She glanced around, took note of the configuration of our party, and said - while gesturing to the bar side - "Could you go and sit on this side, because that side (gesturing to the restaurant side) is really full." We took one look at the height of the seats and knew right away we would not be seating a 5-year-old on one, let alone an 18-month-old toddler in a booster seat where even a "high chair" would end up being level with only about the seats on the stools. We said, "Umm, no, not really, how long for a seat on the other side?" at which point she looked a little flustered and said "Oh, like, maybe 10 or 15 minutes?" to which we replied.. "OK, I guess we can wait." Do take note that, as I mentioned before, there were many available seats on the restaurant side, some of which needed bussing and a wipe but it wasn't like there were pools of blood or something requiring a hazardous biowaste or crime scene cleanup team to restore them to useful condition.

When she realised we were going to wait - which actually seemed to take a full minute (maybe two) to process - she seated a small group of early-twenties behind us in the bar and suddenly seemed to come to a decision. She disappeared around the corner (I use disappeared loosely, as she was still in view - much like the same way an ostrich disappears as its head goes into the sand) and began cleaning the table in a booth on the restaurant side. After about 90 seconds, she was done, and came around to say to us "OK, the table is ready." In the meantime one of the waitstaff scurried off to fetch a sheet of brown paper to be used as a table cloth. I say to be used as a table cloth because, although you provide the brown table paper and the kids colouring page on the children's menu like Montana's (among others), there seem to be no crayons or writing utensils to be found in the Belleville Crabby Joe's.

Well heck, it had really only been 5 minutes, not 10 to 15 so we started to think that in spite of the lack of crayons for our 5 year old (which she quietly whispered a complaint to us about), it might turn out to be an OK experience now that we're past the whole language barrier with the hostess issue. Sadly, this wasn't the case.

We patiently waited at our table as time ticked by. At about 7:15pm, one of the wait staff passing by said, "Oh, I'll be with you in just a minute." Another 5 minutes went by and we started to think perhaps she had been just kidding with us. At about 7:21pm, she returned and asked, "Can I get you some drinks to start?" Obviously, we'd had time to read both our menus and the first few chapters of "War and Peace", so we placed our whole order right away. My wife ordered a diet coke, the Buffalo Chicken Sandwich, and also asked for the "Unlimited salad and garlic skillet bread for $3.99" add-on deal. My daughter ordered the kids 3-cheese pizza meal with "orange pop". I ordered a Coke with no ice and the Philly BBQ Beef sandwich. Now this is important for later, because I was enticed to order this item by the description: Lean roast beef, sauteed with sliced mushrooms and smothered in BBQ sauce. Topped with crispy onions, mozzarella cheese and all piled high on Ciabatta bread. The 18-month-old didn't order anything, mainly because he doesn't talk but also because he was going to be more than happy sharing little bits of the rest of our meals rather than a whole meal for himself and then violating your cardinal rules - you know the one, the "So you pay your bill and go home… and don't make a mess!" one. We really were trying to get into the spirit of the thing.

To make a long story shorter, I won't describe the next 20 minutes because, really, there weren't filled with much to describe. We sat and waited. Only one thing happened in those 20 minutes and that was that my son needed his diaper changed and my wife needed to go to the bathroom. She went there and discovered that in the Ladies bathroom there was exactly the same amount of toilet paper as there were drinks on our table. That is to say, none at all. In that time not much else happened other than us noticing that on the wall it gave us the sage advice that we might want to order dessert first since the meal portions are so large we need to make sure we have room for dessert by getting it before the main course. Your decorators obviously have quite the sense of humour!

At 7:43pm, we began to think that maybe we were on Candid Camera or something. We'd been in the restaurant almost 3/4 of an hour and didn't even have a beverage in front of us. While I began to think there was some kind of conspiracy, like this was a technique to prevent you from actually getting the "Unlimited refills" on soft drinks by not actually giving you your first one until just before you leave, my wife decided that perhaps this was a good time to actually get some answers and service and went to the bar to try and find out where the manager was. The manager she spoke to was named Sonya, and Sonya told her she would look into what was going on because it really was "Not good". Sonya is apparently a master of understatement. Is this part of your management training program?

At 7:48pm, while my wife was gone, a bottle of ketchup and cutlery and napkins were delivered to our table. Finally, I thought, progress. We can either eat ketchup, or paper and ketchup, but we do have the utensils to make sure we use proper manners in doing so. About a minute later my wife returned to the table and just after she sat down, we received our beverages. Well, my wife and I received our beverages. OK, well, she did. I had ordered Coke with no ice (sensitive teeth) and I got a glass of ice with a splash of Coke. My daughter didn't get anything because, as the waitress reported, there were all out of orange pop. I responded, "OK, thank you... but first of all, I actually ordered Coke with no ice, so could you get me one like that please." I then listed off for my daughter the soft drinks available other than orange pop, and she decided to get Sprite. After only about 2 or 3 more minutes, we were all contentedly sipping (OK, the contentedly part is a little sarcasm) on our very special hand-squeezed glasses of pop.

At about 5 minutes to eight, off in the distance I saw our wait person heading our way with three plates - one with the Garlic Skillet Bread and one with Salad, for my wife, and one with pizza for my daughter. Amazingly, it didn't quite take 10 minutes to get something to use our shiny new cutlery on. Things are looking up, we said - just because we came in and thought we'd be out of here before 8:15 pm - at the latest we might still make it if we really eat fast. Then we just might make it to the grocery store which was the rest of our plan for the evening that we drove 40 km for. I decided that I better check my daughter's pizza because, being 5, she tends to eat first and get blisters later from scarfing down portions too hot for human consumption. Although the cheese was melted on her pizza, there was absolutely no danger of her burning her mouth, since on the bottom side it was white. By white, I don't mean lightly golden-yellow toasted, I mean "This was raw and we took it out of the oven just after the surface of the crust hardened enough to lift it but just before any actual cooking went on."  But hey, she's a hungry, hungry kid and its pizza. You know the old adage about pizza, right? The one that goes "Pizza is just like sex. When it's good, its really really good, but when its bad, well, it's still pretty good."

A short time later more food began appearing. Now this is where the very special note I made of the description of what I ordered starts to get important. My wife got her Buffalo Chicken Sandwich and fries, but it was a bit hot so she kept eating her salad and garlic bread for a little while. I received by Philly BBQ Beef Sandwich, but it didn't seem to be what I ordered. Oh, you could take the description "Lean roast beef, sauteed with sliced mushrooms and smothered in BBQ sauce. Topped with crispy onions, mozzarella cheese and all piled high on Ciabatta bread" and apply it, but you had to leave out a bunch of words to actually make an accurate description. I guess there would be two ways to do it to make it fit what the menu said - don't use all the words by saying, "(A) Lean (amount of) roast beef in (a little bit of) BBQ sauce. Topped with (a tablespoon of unidentifiable) cheese on Ciabatta bread." Or you could alternatively use "NOT" and other adverbial-type words to make the description accurate to some degree: "Lean roast beef, NOT sauteed with sliced mushrooms and NOT smothered in BBQ sauce. NOT Topped with crispy onions, mozzarella cheese and DEFINITELY NOT all piled high on Ciabatta bread."

Have you ever purchased a package of Buddig beef, in the 85g size? It comes in a plastic bag type package from the grocery store. It costs, oh, around a dollar. If you have ever opened these packages you would know that inside there are about 8-10 thin slices of beef. What I got appeared to be about the equivalent of two of those slices, one on each of the two pieces of Ciabatta bread, with about a thimble of BBQ sauce on each. On top of these was cheese amounting to about the equivalent of one half of a Kraft single processed cheese slice distributed over the two halves of the sandwich.

AWESOME, I thinks... this will really fill that hole I have been waiting an hour to fill. If I were 9 years old.

I absolutely readily admit I was completely aghast. I was so disgusted I was ready to drop $5 on the table for my daughter's meal and a couple of bucks for our pop and then leave without a word. My wife and I discussed it back and forth. She was actually enjoying her salad and the bread, although it appeared that the whole "Unlimited" thing was going to be somewhat of a misnomer since we were going to have to rush out without so much as another bowl before anyone came back with more. I said to her, while she studied my somewhat questionable dinner with the Boy-am-I-glad-I-didn't-order-that-look, "OK, now what do I do? We asked what was taking so long and they bring me this? What's next, spit on the french fries?" OK that last part about the french fries I didn't say out loud, I only thought it. Luckily by some (select one of:quirk of gravity/glitch in the space time continuum/fear for her future tip) our wait person came back during the discussion and actually asked if everything was good. The obvious answer was... "No" and neither my wife nor I was in any way reluctant to say it. I looked at my watch, resigned to the fact that our whole evening was now pretty much down the tubes, and said, "This is not really what the menu said I was getting. Can someone please fix this?" and she took it away.

Within a few seconds of my plate disappearing back into the bowels of the kitchen, a brown-haired woman in a dark shirt was moving in a rather determined way toward our table. I wasn't sure of it at the time, but I surmised (or maybe it was hoped) that this was in fact the manager, Sonya. She got to our table with a stricken look on her face and said, "I'm really sorry, I was trying to fix the problems you already had and things are just getting worse!" I pulled out my menu, asked her if she had seen what I had been given and said, "Disregarding the lack of the sauteed mushrooms and crispy onions, the world piled couldn't in any way be applied to what I got - but I guess you could use lean in a descriptive sentence several times." She agreed, and she apologised. We explained that we weren't even sure what to do, because waiting for another sandwich was going to be a problem for us time-wise. She said to us that she was really sorry and that this was not in any way typical of how things usually go there. She told us our meal was completely on the house, and she really hoped we would try again sometime in the future and to please not hold this experience against them. She then went back in the back to presumably try and hurry along my new sandwich and maybe to fire everyone involved, but I can't be sure. At roughly a quarter past eight she returned followed by my newly remade dinner. I knew I was never going to be able to take the time to eat it because it was much too hot to touch this time, so I just patiently waited for a chance to ask for a take-out box. Sonya once again apologised, reassured us that this was not typical and said she hoped we would give them another try someday. She had brought my daughter an extra-large serving of ice cream as the final bit of her kids meal and was trying very hard to make things right.

At 8:32 pm, almost exactly one and a half hours from the time we first spoke to the hostess/I-to-E translator, we made it back to our car with my order which had become "To go". We felt miserable and relieved to be out of there, although somewhat satisfied that at least we hadn't paid $40 for the whole experience. When I asked my wife if we would try and go to Crabby Joe's again so we could use our iCoke certificate, she said "Maybe the one in Kingston?"

I almost didn't have the heart to tell her that we were at the location the furthest east in Ontario, and that if we wanted to go again the second-closest was Port Perry - merely 195 km from our home.

Thanks,
A Crabby PolarBear
Ontario, Canada

P.S. I do need to address the issue of what I ordered compared to what I got a final time. You've seen the description enough by now to have committed it to memory. The Philly BBQ Beef Sandwich I received the second time, after it was "corrected", was still not what was on the menu. There were mushrooms on it the second time, but they were barely warm or cooked, virtually raw - no saute-ing of mushrooms happened involving my food. However, my "crispy onions" were actually a very reasonable facsimile of sauteed, although they were actually supposed to be "crispy" which is way past sauteed. The final description of the sandwich I took home would be "Lean roast beef, with sliced slightly-cooked mushrooms and smothered in BBQ sauce. Topped with sauteed onions, a little mozzarella cheese and all piled haphazardly on Ciabatta bread". I just wasn't in a position to be too fussy any more by then.

P.P.S. This is usually the place that one puts all the legal disclaimers and such if corresponding with a corporate entity but I'll refrain from that. What I really do want to say is that the manager on duty, Sonya, really was trying to make things right for us and the problems seemed to be more systemic with the whole operation rather than her efforts that evening. If it was not for her, we would never consider going to that, or any other, Crabby Joe's location again - there would be a zero percent chance. I have worked as a manager and an assistant manager in several different restaurants in the past, before having to leave the industry due to chronic illness. My wife worked as wait staff for many years in her early 20s. We both have a deep understanding of what goes on "out back" in a restaurant, and the whole experience we just went through seems to both of us to be completely beyond the highest level of outrageous. Either there were an astonishing number of coincidences that occurred or there is a very serious training and upper level management problem in that store. If you have not received complaints, there may be dozens of very unsatisfied people out there after going to the Belleville Crabby Joe's - after all, a maximum of 1 in 10 customers who have a bad experience will take the time to complain about it, although the other 9 will make sure to tell around 10 of their friends/acquaintances each. I can't address Sonya's competence in managing staff because I didn't see all of the goings-on, but her customer relations skills were very good and she did pretty much everything I could have expected her to be able to do.

A final point needs to be made. I am a poker player. I actually am good enough to be able to consistently make money playing Texas Hold'Em. As a poker player I think of things in terms of odds. Not only do you need to "Know when to hold'em, know when to fold'em", but there is the deeper issue of really knowing when something is a good bet or an unwarranted risk due to the odds and the players involved. At this point, I really am not sure whether eating at Crabby Joe's again - even using our $20 iCoke certificate - is a justifiable risk or an unwarranted waste of money. If and how you handle this further will have a big influence on the odds of our return.

Friday, August 11, 2006

How To Bring Down An Airliner

You know, with all this crap with the current "sophisticated terrorist threat" going on right now, I feel like I am just going to lose my mind. NONE of what these guys was going to do is particularly original, innovative or sophisticated. Fact is... and I have said it before although maybe not here... if a crazy person or a fanatic wants you dead, you're going to be dead. There is not a damn thing you can do about it. With all the possible ways to damage an airplane or its passengers, the only way to actually prevent someone who was sophisticated or intelligent from doing harm would be to board all passengers naked after doing complete body cavity searches, handing out hospital gowns on the plane and then letting people get clothes from their checked luggage on the other end. And you'd STILL find some nutcase who takes a dose of ex-lax and swallows condoms full of the separate chemical constituents of something explosive, goes to the bathroom on the plane and mixes himself up a shit-bomb. I know! Lets board all passengers in artificially induced comas. And the sad thing about that is, if they did it, some idiots would still fly.

Thursday, August 10, 2006

Note To The President

Dear George Bush, They don't hate you for your "freedom". They hate you because you don't mind your own fucking business and try to impose your brand of "freedom" on everybody. They also hate you because you, as the leader of the one government in the world leaning the most towards fascism, have the big hairy Texas cajones to call someone ELSE fascist. Sincerely, PolarBear P.S. If it wasn't so sad, it would be funny.

Saturday, March 18, 2006

Oscar, Old Bags 'N Haggis

Annie Proulx recently wrote an essay slamming the choice of the Paul Haggis film Crash over Brokeback Mountain (adapted from her own short story) for Best Picture from the AMPAS. I could not disagree with her more – what a surprise, eh? Heavens help me, having to defend something as unctuous as the cash-and-politics motivated Academy…  but really, it isn’t that I feel that what they do most of the time is correct. It’s just that having seen both films, I think they actually got this right for a change.

I don't want someone jumping down my neck calling me homophobic or anything else either. I'm not gay, so I don't have an agenda, but I am frequently one of the people who gets into disagreements with bible thumping fascists and my family and friends about gay marriage and equal rights. I support everyone's right to be what they are, and to live their life how they choose as long as it is not at anyone else's expense. Oh, well, one caveat - I never support anyone's right to be stupid or bigoted. I am totally against stupidity and I see bigotry as an extension of that.

Ok... all the qualifications done? Great. Oh, maybe one more. Let's remember, now, that everyone has different opinions of films. Some people love Star Wars, some people hate it, some people only like the original trilogy - and that is only ONE movie series! When you consider the diversity of what is "out there", it is perfectly understandable that people have their own tastes and their own opinions.

Brokeback Mountain was a visually stunning film - even if some of the scenery was "cheated" visual effects rather than cinematography (as a photographer, I always feel like I cheat if I have to clean up a picture even a little bit, although that is part of the art). Heath Leger did a fantastic job in his role, but I can't compare him to Hoffman because I have not yet seen Capote. I did enjoy the movie somewhat - but I didn't feel it was worthy of winning best picture. To me, it was maudlin melodrama... maybe it’s because I already believed that who you love is your business and no one else’s, so I didn't need the "schooling" provided? When I watched it, the feeling I kept having was - I saw this movie before, only it was different genders. One version was a man and a woman who met every year to carry on an affair. Another version was when a black man and a white woman had a forbidden ongoing affair. The only significant difference between Brokeback and a couple of other movies in the last 30-40 years was that the couple both had the same genitalia. It just was not something witty, original or unique other than the sexual preferences. Sure, getting it made in what is still essentially a homophobic society in America was something to be admired - but the movie didn't have the emotional depth it should have. At times, I felt manipulated watching it. At times I felt almost like it was mocking straight relationships and pulling a nudge nudge, wink wink at us. It came across as being almost a backlash against "the boys" trying to fit in. Maybe because it was adapted from a short story, but I felt it just didn't address the real depth of the issue. I also felt it was muddled and unclear in some places, leaving some things so ambiguous that you weren't sure exactly what was supposed to have happened. Did they get married and "pass" for straight because it was simply fear, or was it because that was what was expected of them from society/parents/etc.? Do gay people stay in the closet because they are genuinely afraid for their lives at all times, or is it a multilayered problem of expectations, society, obligations, and so on?

I'm not actually ASKING questions there, I have a pretty good idea of the answers and that is my point. I felt that BBM didn't even try to touch on many of these things, and in order to garner the praise it has, it SHOULD have. Or maybe, it was just done so subtly that my inferior mind didn't grasp it? It felt more like someone was trying to tell me it is bad to kill people just because they are gay, something that I thought we had more or less agreed upon as a society with few exceptions. And I express the concept that way <i>in direct response</i> to people who have said that Crash just tells us racism is bad and therefore isn't innovative or original. Consider this: people hear that the movie is about gay cowboys. People who are open-minded or curious are going to see the film. People who are closed minded and prejudiced will NOT see it. Doesn't that mean that BBM is basically preaching to the choir? The people who NEED to see BBM are exactly the crowd that refuse to, so if you fail to get your message to the people that most need to hear it, isn't that a problem? The message of BBM was that love transcends all - gender, race and all other obstacles - that was the point, wasn't it?

Ugh, I almost wrote half of that in non-sequiturs. I am sure it will get worse, being 4am and all.

When I watched Crash (tonight, in fact), I couldn't help but draw comparisons in my mind about which movie was better. I had already seen Brokeback... I already knew the outcome of the Oscar voting, and I already knew about Annie Proulx's little tirade and I was really prepared to sit through an inferior film that was all hype. I could not have been more pleasantly surprised. In spite of the "obvious" theme of racism, I felt it was innovative because it showed us not only white-on-black racism, but that all of us, no matter our ethnic background, even those with the best intentions, have prejudices and racist beliefs at times. During Crash I laughed, I felt horrified, I felt sickened and I felt immense sadness. I don't think I ever found myself pulled in so many directions by a film. For almost every character, there was an evolution of your connection to them... at times you were revulsed by their actions, at times you felt immense compassion for them... and it ran the gamut. Hate 'em, love 'em, pity 'em, worship 'em - at different times in the movie I felt one of those ways about most of them. I'm usually a person who hates the blatant attempts by the entertainment industry to manipulate my feelings but when it came to Crash, it was so witty and well done that I didn't find I resented it at all.

Of the two films, I enjoyed Crash a lot more. Is it because I couldn't stand the man-on-man love action in BBM? No, that doesn't enter into it at all - I didn't feel uncomfortable watching Brokeback. What I felt was a little bored, and gypped out of what I expected from the film. Now this is my opinion, and my taste, and nothing you say can change how I feel in my gut about the two films.

Let's put it this way: I often use Rotten Tomatoes as a guideline (and ONLY a guideline) to decide which movie to rent or see in the theatre. I don't think there has been a film with more than 100 reviews that has achieved a rating of 100%. That means that no matter how good something is, there is always someone out there who doesn't like it. 95% "Fresh" reviews means there are 5% "Rotten" reviews, and neither Crash(71%) nor Brokeback Mountain(86%) comes close to being loved by everyone. Capote rates 91%, higher than both films discussed here, but that still means that 1 in 10 critics don't like it. So, if I call BBM maudlin melodrama remade from some 70s romantic movie, that view is based on MY experiences with movies (and life) and my tastes. It doesn't mean I hate gay people or I am prejudiced or that I am afraid watching it will turn me gay or my kids gay - it just means I didn't enjoy it the way others did.

Obviously, enough people at the AMPAS had similar feelings or at least arrived at a similar conclusion by whatever method they chose to use when deciding on the award. And that's why it didn't win best picture, in spite of Annie Proulx's senile and vitriolic ranting.

Annie, I love your writing, I loved the Shipping News, but at 70 I hardly think YOU are the guardian or spokesperson for "what was stirring contemporary culture" any more than the "conservative heffalump academy voters". Maybe its time to put away your keyboard/pen/slate and take up knitting. Or maybe kickboxing, considering the barely-contained fury?

Tuesday, March 14, 2006

Isaac Hayes - Hypocrite Extraordinaire

Isaac Hayes has quit South Park. He claims he can "no longer stomach" the show ridiculing people's religious beliefs. He must have an extraordinarily strong stomach, though. He didn't say anything for 7 years of South Park lampooning every conceivable religious belief. It is only now, after his fake-religion Scientology brethern have had a go at him because South Park made fun of Scientology last fall that he can't stomach it. Seems more like Isaac Hayes is a brain-washed pussy. Probably, Tom Cruise threatened to stop performing sexual favours for him if he didn't leave the show. I think I am going to open up a pool right now - the pool will be:
What will the air date of the episode where Chef is kidnapped by aliens and taken to see L. Ron Hubbard, and becomes a part of his cult?
All I can say is... Isaac Hayes has a lot in common with Mr. Hankey.

Thursday, February 16, 2006

Here's Hopin'

Joe Roth Predicts Pixar Will "Infuse" Disney Revolution Pictures Chairman Joe Roth has indicated that although Disney is buying Pixar Animation, he expects that creatively Pixar will be taking over Disney. Roth, the former chairman of Walt Disney Studios and currently a member of the Pixar board, told Fred Topel, who writes a newsletter for the About.com website: "I think what will happen is that Pixar will totally infuse Disney with its own stuff. ... If Disney can't make movies up to the quality of Pixar, they'll have to stop." Roth predicted that Disney will eventually produce two animated features a year, one original and one sequel. "By the way," he said. "I think that pays for the [$7.4-billion acquisition] themselves, the fact that these guys are doing the sequels, if they would, to Monsters, Incredibles, Toy Story, Nemo, and things like that." Pixar chiefs Steve Jobs and John Lasseter have long said that they would only agree to produce a sequel if it was better than the original, and that they would be opposed to producing the kind of direct-to-video "cheapquels" that Disney has lucratively churned out in recent years.
Well... maybe it is wishful thinking but ... at least Eishole is gone.

Saturday, January 28, 2006

Brad Bird Part Deux

Note: Believe it or not I wrote most of this entry over a year ago and then saved it as a draft. I completely forgot about it until I was reviewing old unposted blog entries and found it sitting there. However, the rant is still apt and can be applied to lots of situations: It is too late to rant a lot or say much of anything, so just a short one. Tonight, I watched Iron Giant, Brad Bird's 1999 WB release. You can see where he started out experimenting with a lot of the stuff he did in The Incredibles. Iron Giant is, on its own, a great movie too. But, that makes things terribly frustrating. Primarily for "The Incredibles", but also for "Iron Giant", I see a lot of teen and twenty-somethings braying about how they are all "overrated" and even going so far as to say they suck. Odd, since I thought Lizzy McGuire and The Princess Diaries pretty much sucked, being that they were teen feely-goody recycled crap. There is nothing original in these reused Wonderful World of Disney / ABC Afterschool Special loads of manure. I hate to say it, but they show their complete lack of experience and knowledge of pop-culture of their childhood when they rag on The Incredibles. The whole movie is spoof, an homage - that is the point. Then, watch out if you call them on it, because you will get a double barrelled load of immature insecurity and angst launched back at you. One dipshit actually put me on ignore on the IMDB because he was losing a debate, making himself look like an ass, and blaming ME for it. It was hilarious. I remember being that age. I don't ever remember being LIKE that at that age though. The things kids have today as reference sources are astonishing, however, they seem to think that because all of this stuff has been around for over 10 years now they are somehow more "worldly" than the real adults in the world, you know, the ones who have been around for more than 2 decades... Wow, I cannot believe I am saying this, I really AM old. If you don't get The Incredibles and you are between 13 and 29, then forget it. Otherwise I have to tell you to go watch all the Moore/Connery James Bond movies, the original Star Wars trilogy, and every hero/superhero and sci-fi movie made before 1990. Then I have to go tell you to get off the Internet and read a book. A comic book, that is. Because if you don't get the Watchmen, Fantastic Four, X-Men, Batman Marvel, DC and myriad of other references (aside from the obvious that you have to be in some way mentally deficient to not understand a comic book) then you won't get something like The Incredibles any more than you would "get" a movie about Shakespeare without knowing who Shakespeare was. Just because the Internet has been around since you were a teen or a kid does NOT mean you know everything.

Thursday, January 26, 2006

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaa?

Pamela Anderson has lost her fight with the Kentucky state government. What was this epic struggle about? She (as part of her PETA “activism”) demanded that they remove the bust of KFC founder Harland Sanders from their Capitol building. Although arguably she may be an expert on the removal or replacement of busts, let’s put aside this is a Canadian born “actress” who has made her living on the fact that she gave a beer company executive a woody during a CFL game… and does not live anywhere NEAR Kentucky, nor have anything to do with the state… we won’t even get into the other astonishing MYOFB aspects of it... Her statement about Kentucky Fried Chicken, her “raison d’etre” in this conflict, is that KFC is a company "that mutilates God's creatures". Perhaps the hypocrisy would be easier to take coming from someone who:
  1. Hasn’t had numerous plastic surgery procedures, installing and removing implants and so on
  2. Doesn’t have tattoos covering any percentage of their skin
  3. Didn’t make movies like “Barb Wire” and so on, involving violent portrayals of killing PEOPLE
Who the fuck does she think she is exactly? Possibly one of the greatest living examples of the celebrity penchant for “mutilating” themselves with surgery and “mutilating” people by committing assault and murder is telling the home state of one of the more successful businesses in the western world that they can’t pay tribute to a man who helped bring their state out of obscurity and made it into a household name? Oh wait, I get it, she doesn’t consider herself one of “God’s creatures”. She only believes in “God” when it is convenient to her whacked-out PETA agenda. Shall we even get into the number of “chickens choked” thanks to the thousands of males who viewed her Playboy pictorials or homemade porn movies? Oh, Pam… please stick to mutilating your own body and don’t worry about what might happen in the production of those covered with traditional 11 herbs and spices. We’re all heartbroken to know you don’t eat greasy, disgusting KFC (Please note: This does not mean I have any endorsement for KFC, nor do I agree with the way they treat livestock – it is the hypocrisy of Ms. Plastic Breasts that I find amusing). Now STFU.

Wednesday, January 25, 2006

Nooooooooooooooooo...........

House of Crap buys Bastion of Brilliance...   I guess it makes sense in a way, considering the only decent thing to be distributed by Disney in the last 10 years has been anything done by PIXAR. Since they were in danger of losing that source of revenue, they more or less had to buy it.   On the bright side, it means we will probably get movies like The Incredibles 2. Unfortunately, it will be a direct-to-video release piece of crap with no remnants of the original voice cast, director, or brilliance.   I think I just threw up in my mouth a little...

Wednesday, January 18, 2006

Ban Stupidity, Not Baby Walkers

I've seen this once before, but today it was emailed to me by my Mom. I just thought it belonged here as an expression of EXACTLY how screwed up our "western culture" has become...   TO ALL THE KIDS WHO SURVIVED the 1930's 40's, 50's, 60's and 70's:  First, we survived being born to mothers who smoked and/or drank while they carried us. They took aspirin, ate blue cheese dressing, tuna from a can, and didn't get tested for diabetes. Then after that trauma, our baby cribs were covered with bright colored lead-based paints. We had no childproof lids on medicine bottles, doors or cabinets and when we rode our bikes, we had no helmets. We rode in cars with no car seats, seat belts or air bags. Riding in the back of a pick up on a warm day was always a special treat.  We drank water from the garden hose and NOT from a bottle. We shared one soft drink with four friends, from one bottle and NO ONE actually died from this.  We ate cupcakes, white bread and real butter and drank soda pop with sugar in it, but we weren't overweight because WE WERE ALWAYS OUTSIDE PLAYING! We would leave home in the morning and play all day, as long as we were back when the streetlights came on (or when dad whistled). No one was able to reach us all day. And we were O.K.  We would spend hours building our go-carts out of scraps and then ride down the hill, only to find out we forgot the brakes. After running into the bushes a few times, we learned to solve the problem.  We did not have Playstation, Nintendo, X-box, or home computers - no video games at all. No 99 channels on cable, no video tape or DVD movies, no surround sound, no cell phones, no Internet or Internet chatrooms... but WE HAD FRIENDS and we went outside and found them!  We fell out of trees, got cuts & bruises, broke bones and teeth and there were no lawsuits from these accidents.  We ate worms and mud pies made from dirt, and the worms did not live in us forever. We were given BB guns for our 10th birthdays, made up games with sticks and tennis balls and, although we were told it would happen, we did not put out very many eyes.  We rode bikes or walked to a friend's house and knocked on the door or rang the bell, or just walked in and talked to them!  The idea of a parent bailing us out if we broke the law (or a window) was unheard of. They actually sided with the law!  We had freedom, failure, success and responsibility, and we learned HOW TO DEAL WITH IT ALL!  You might want to share this with others who have had the luck to grow up as kids, before the lawyers and the government regulated our lives for our own good.  Kind of makes you want to run through the house with scissors, doesn't it?

Thursday, January 12, 2006

Cognitive Dissonance

Ahhh, politics. Socially-sanctioned hypocrisy disguising itself as democracy. Here in Canada it is almost Election Day. Our elections don’t take place in the same way as some other countries. It is usually up to the government itself to call an election, or in the case of a minority government (as has happened this time) the opposition decides to make a motion of non-confidence in the government and force an election. I personally despise politics. Why? Because it brings out the worst in most people involved in it, even the most well-meaning people. I really believe that most politicians, no matter how morally bankrupt they may have become, started out with a genuine desire to help people. They really wanted to make things better. Problem is, once they got into the process, and the longer they are in it, the more they realise that they can’t help everyone. And, of course, that means they are left with 2 choices in those situations:
a) Be honest and say, hey, I can’t help you. Sorry. b) Tell them you WILL help them but then do diddly.
Human nature being what it is, choice a) leads to the thought that if they don’t help people, they won’t get re-elected and, depending on the person, either worries about losing the power of being in such a position or concerns about NOT being able to help at least some people any more. There is always a little bit of arrogance involved, I mean, most people are completely incapable of admitting that someone else might be able to do their job better. So, most politicians choose b). And once you start lying, it becomes really difficult to stop. You may not have meant it as anything but a little white lie to help someone feel better, but it still virtually ALWAYS leads to bigger lies as the pressure builds. It is the nature of the beast. I have found it astonishing over the last few days to see how selective memory plays a role in the mind of voters. Let me just preface any further comments with this: my political beliefs are quite libertarian. I honestly had no idea what that really meant until the last few years. I didn’t know there WAS a political view defined by how I felt. So, I am not a Liberal. I am not a Conservative, Progressive Conservative, or Reformer. I do not support or believe in the New Democratic Party of Canada. My views are not from my Progressive Conservative upbringing or inspired by religious beliefs that colour how I think OTHER people should behave. I believe we as a society should support the sick and elderly because compassion is critical, so there is a little bit of socialist in me – but the rest of the time I think that the government needs to leave well enough alone. So, here it is. I know that there are going to be lots of politically partisan hacks who will dispute my observations but this is how I have viewed the last 30-odd years of Canadian government. As a kid, I was surprisingly (disturbingly?) aware of what the government was doing – I remember getting pains in my stomach every time the Liberal government brought in a budget with a deficit in the 70s, knowing who EXACTLY was going to have to pay for all this borrowed money. Trudeau and the Liberals in the late 60s to early 80s basically created the national debt. Sure, we owed money as a nation here and there at times but for the most part, wiser budgeting then – instead of using overspending on social programs to attempt to buy elections – would have prevented much of what was to come later. It really was the Liberals who started the mess in the first place, at least for those in power in my lifetime. Good socialist ideas governments had implemented became what the voters EXPECTED, even demanded, to have. When the country came to its senses for a short time and elected a minority PC government in 1979 based on their promises to reign in the runaway spending, the Conservatives of Joe Clark blew it, showing that typical arrogance present in politicians. They handed power back to the Liberals in 1980, believing to the bitter end that they would just win a majority government in a new election to replace their minority. That led to 4 more years of Liberal financial irresponsibility. That led to more political backlash on the part of regular Canadians, leading to the election of the Brian Mulroney led PC party in 1984, in which they were given a HUGE majority - the 2nd largest in Canadian history. However, in spite of this mandate, the attempts by the Mulroney PCs to reduce the deficit were hindered by the fact that the Canadian Senate (which consists of political appointees who were largely from the party who had governed for the last 20 years) was dominated by Liberals who fought the conservative government at almost every turn. That is not to say that there were not problems with the PC party. After being out of power, many old-school Conservatives expected political patronage appointments for their years of loyalty to the party in opposition, and some got them. There were a few incidents which demonstrated that the Liberals were not the only party who liked to hand dollars over to their friends, but from my perspective the level of corruption was less a problem than the inability to impose controls and standards over their huge parliamentary majority. The 1988 election reduced that problem – the PCs still retained a comfortable majority (almost 60%) of the seats in the House of Commons and garnered over 43% of the popular vote because people hadn't yet forgotten the Liberal corruption and mismanagement of the previous decade. Then came the recession. It was not a CANADIAN recession, it was worldwide. However, there are still those who blame the Mulroney government for it. It is completely foolish to do so; all countries were in the same boat. If anything it was admirable that the PC party did not do what the Liberals did in the same situation – ignore it and spend more - but the cuts and changes they were making were difficult. As much as many voters CLAIM they don’t want to dump debt on their children, the fact is that almost the entire Baby Boomer generation has been raised with an attitude of entitlement so when it comes down to it they don’t want debt passed on to their children AS LONG AS IT DOES NOT COST THEM ANYTHING. At this time the Mulroney PCs also introduced the GST. The GST was NOT a new tax. No, you idiot, yes you, the one jumping up and down over there, it wasn’t. The GST is a 7% tax that replaced an 11-13% manufacturer’s tax. The manufacturer’s tax was applied on all goods manufactured in Canada which meant that Canadian exports were taxed before export, and therefore were more expensive than other countries goods right from the get-go, making us less competitive in the world economy. The GST is paid on all items whether of Canadian manufacture or otherwise equally. It is a fairer system. But – in one of the worst PR debacles in history - the PC party was unable to clearly convey this to Canadians. Of course, most of them weren’t listening – all they saw was that the government was taking 7% right at the cash register. MANY retailers took advantage of the situation, as well – in spite of the fact that the cost of what was being delivered to stores was reduced by the manufacturers tax, they did not roll back prices. Instead, many padded their profit margin by the 10%+ difference and then blamed the government. So, Canadians hate the GST. Never mind that it is fairer, it is a good excuse to bitch and piss and moan about what an asshole Mulroney is. Yeah, the same guy from Baie Comeau everyone loved, the same guy that was elected to 2 consecutive substantial majority governments – suddenly he is the most despised man in Canada. He resigns in 1993 because who really wants to be the most hated person in Canada? He drops the whole mess into the lap of the new PC leader Kim Campbell. Campbell was, to say the least, not exactly prepared and fumbled around like a tuna on a trawler. In spite of the fact that the PCs were finally in a position to balance the budget after their economic initiatives were working and get Canada back on track, the Liberals were elected in 1993. Not based on any level of competence or ability. Not because they were a different group of politicians who Canada had tossed out of office for corruption and mismanagement less than 10 years before. Oh, no. They were elected because they promised they would abolish the GST. Kim Campbell's floudering campaign and numerous gaffes didn't help any, either. The PC party was virtually obliterated, winning only 2 seats and losing official party status. Much of this was due to vote splitting, since the Reform party had appeared as a right-wing alternative and culled a substantial number of PC votes – but it was still largely because of the voter’s selective and short memory. Forget how much the Liberals had run the country into the ground from the 60s to the 80s; forget it was them who created the deficit in the first place – NOW they say they will get rid of that pesky GST. The Liberals didn’t balance the budget right away, nor did they eliminate the GST. They took 3 years longer to balance it that the Conservatives (or their own) projections, and they actually tried to fool us all by merging the GST with provincial taxes so they could say they got rid of it. In the end it was as much an improvement of the economy that led to balancing the budget as anything, something the Liberal’s actually had little to do with since it was the initiatives created in the PC years before, INCLUDING abolishing the MST, that were making Canada’s economy stronger. But, of course, it would not be politically astute to be honest and admit that you were handed the ball while you were already standing in the end zone. Just dance around like a fool screaming, "I scored! I rock!" The Liberal’s entire mandate over the last 12+ years has been rife with financial scandals and waste. They have cut funds going to the taxpayers and the provinces but continued to hand over funds to their cronies. They cancelled purchases initiated by the PC party but then spent TWICE AS MUCH to get half of what the PC deal would have delivered. They have repeatedly weathered controversies and disposed of MPs who have stood up for what is right, and despite any logical conclusion that they should be tossed out in the next election, keep getting returned to power. The level of greed, corruption, and entitlement has been astonishing, making the Mulroney government and even the Trudeau Liberals leadership look like that of Charlemagne, Churchill and Alexander the Great. Should I even get INTO the whole Mike Harris provincial PC thing? The fact is they were elected by the middle class based on the idea that they were going to kick all those lazy, good-for-nothing welfare collectors out into the job market and make them pay their own way. Yep, let’s cut down on government spending by victimizing the most vulnerable element, after all, they are the drain on our society. It never occurred to those voters that if those assholes were willing enough to take from the poor they would be MORE than willing to take from those who weren’t in need. He wasn’t elected only ONCE but TWICE. The thing is, they did EXACTLY what they said they were going to do. They were the most honest politicians to come along for ages. But now, selective memory has turned them into sleazy lying corrupt demons. No, folks, you elected them based on what they said they were going to do. They did exactly that. Then, the Liberals came along in the last election and lied to you and said they were going to do things better. So, you elected them. Even when it was obvious late in the campaign that they had no intention of following through with many of their promises, you elected them. Now you hate them for lying. But you hate the other guys before them for telling the truth and doing it, so honestly, what do you expect from politicians? Let’s sum it all up this way. The Liberals are the same Liberals they have been for over 30 years, provincially and federally. They have gleefully taken everything they could from taxpayers because we keep letting them. Every time someone notices this fact they employ the “Hey, look over there!” tactic and then run away. They are sleazy and corrupt and drunk from years of power. Their entire CAMPAIGN this election has been a smear campaign, citing half-truths and out-of-context quotes. They have lied and lied, and then, to cover the lies, they lie some more. The Conservative Party is, for all intents and purposes, a bunch of political rookies with no clue how to govern. There is nothing much left of the “old guard” of the PC party. Some of them are right-wing fundamentalist nitwits who have no place in the Canadian governmental system because they can’t grasp that we are a multicultural society with many different beliefs and values. Some of them are America-lovers who don’t understand Canadians for the most part do not WANT to be part of the U.S.A. The old green blood of the Reform Party runs through much of the Western portion of the new Conservatives, that same party that was caught on several occasions spouting bigoted and racist propaganda. They will trample on YOUR rights to do what you want to do because THEY don’t think you should do it, even if it is none of their business. That whole Charter of Rights thing is a big inconvenience to how they want to govern. The NDP is a bunch of clueless Union reps, who throughout their recent history have lost touch with reality: that‘s the one where if you run a company out of business trying to greedily get more and more for yourself, YOU NO LONGER HAVE A JOB; the same one where if you have a government job you are there to do the job, not to whine about how overworked you are and demand pay raises while all other taxpayers have to foot the bill. The New Democrat’s brand of socialism sounds nice to this disabled Canadian on the surface, but if you actually dig into what would be involved in implementing their ideas, you realise that all they are is a bunch of idealistic turd-polishers. All other parties involved aren’t even running enough candidates to govern even if they had ALL of them elected. So if you are trying to elect a government as opposed to a candidate, you must vote for the 3 fantastic choices above. So, honestly, where do you put your vote?

Tuesday, January 10, 2006

Get Out My Striped Suit, Dear...

Annoying someone via the Internet is now a federal crime.   It's no joke. Last Thursday, President Bush signed into law a prohibition on posting annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without disclosing your true identity.   In other words, it's OK to flame someone on a mailing list or in a blog as long as you do it under your real name. Thank Congress for small favors, I guess.   This ridiculous prohibition, which would likely imperil much of Usenet, is buried in the so-called Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act. Criminal penalties include stiff fines and two years in prison.   "The use of the word 'annoy' is particularly problematic," says Marv Johnson, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union. "What's annoying to one person may not be annoying to someone else."   Buried deep in the new law is Sec. 113, an innocuously titled bit called "Preventing Cyberstalking." It rewrites existing telephone harassment law to prohibit anyone from using the Internet "without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy."
[Follow the title link for the rest of the article]   Wow.   I am going to do hard time. If I was American. Oh wait - aren't we all American? At least, when it comes to the law, that's what the USA thinks...   Obviously, they added the "real name" part so that Dubya would not be subject to doing hard time every time someone quoted him in a 'net article.

Wednesday, January 04, 2006

PWN3D!!!!

CNN... you assholes...   Let's review now, for those of you who failed journalism school, which appears to consist of your ENTIRE staff of high school dropouts:
As a reporter (or news agency), it is your job to VERIFY THE FACTS BEFORE you report them.
It is NOT your job to scoop everyone and get a FALSE story out first.  It is ALSO not your job to spend the next 24 hours after a tragedy trying to COVER YOUR ASS BECAUSE YOU FUCKED UP!!!!  Un-fuck-ing-be-liev-a-ble. 12 miners dead, and all you are worried about is who to blame because YOU DIDN'T DO YOUR FUCKING JOB RIGHT.  It is January 4, 2006. The clear winner, already, of asshole of the year, is CNN.  Also, understatement of the century, a quote from Anderson Cooper, who sums up the collective intellect of CNN:
"I'm completely stunned"
Oh, yes. You are!